So I sat, hunched, coding, and got a wicked migraine. I knew immediately, I would not be able to stay on the project if I continued like that. So instead, I made a plan. Now I get up at least every hour for a bathroom break and a few minutes in the sun — I literally walk across the parking lot. Sometimes, I even stretch or do a few squats to shake out my legs and back from all the computer work.
Well, not think, I know. My mom has been calling me one since birth. But man, other document reviewers are strange. They get very frustrated with the project manager, emailing him every few hours with other questions and then vocalizing their frustration with his responses. It gets exhausting — mostly because their questions and concerns are over inconsequential issues in the e-Discovery platform or just basic computer errors.
Nothing to really get up in arms about, but they do. Also, some people will want to, or need to, chat every so often. There are some people in the room with me that I have not uttered a single word to, and then there are three older women who know my entire life story, and I theirs.
It will make this mundane job much more entertaining, and time will go by much faster. As a temporary worker you are covered by the AWR regulations, which means that you benefit from the same facilities and other benefits such as annual leave entitlement as the firms permanent employees. Send your CV Brief Us. Location, Town or City.
Type Temporary. Sector Private Practice. In House. Refine search. The window between the start of litigation and initial disclosures has narrowed significantly from to 90 days , coupled with a continuing growth in data generated or documents to review means that document review is in a constant state of having to do more work in less time.
Rather, efficiency is. There truly is no way to properly emphasize how important it is for legal teams to have playbooks and protocols ready to go. Once the ball gets rolling, there is simply too much to do and not enough time to fuss about planning ahead properly. However, when it comes to document review, where the details matter greatly and the process is too complicated to reliably generate the desired results without a solid playbook informing your decisions.
A playbook should contain a standardized schedule that starts whenever litigation can reasonably be expected. Reasonable expectation of litigation is the point when legal teams must start preserving evidence through legal holds according to FRCP 37 e. The playbook should also provide an overview of the responsibilities of every team member involved, as well as a standardized list of tags to use when coding documents following review.
As mentioned above, the time allowance on initial disclosure and discovery requests is very limited and deadlines very tight. At the same time, those deadlines are pretty much set in stone, which means they are predictable. Using templates and automation to play into the predictable nature of the process can be a big time saver and help ensure consistency.
For the review process itself, having a consistent process of collecting data helps speed collection. It also reduces the amount of confusion that may occur around the collection process, since everybody involved in it will know exactly what goes out since communications are standardized.
The task of performing document review requires a skill set that mixes project management, legal expertise, subject matter expertise, and technological skill. In addition to those measurable skills, there are also intangibles such as the reviewer being able to deal well with stress, being a good communicator, and being detail-oriented.
All of these are important for a member of the review team to have. When the chips are down, the people in a review team are the ones who operate the technology and execute the process detailed in the playbooks and plans. Making sure those people are the right ones is vital. The document review as discussed here is considered a first-level document review, with the second and third level taking place after initial disclosures to get a sense of what can be used for or against in court second level and to ensure that the evidence produced can be found again later if needed third level.
In that first level, the balance between work done by in-house or external counsel varies between organizations and even from case to case at times. From a cost reduction point of view, the more work that can be done in-house, the better. After the degrees are earned, the candidate must pass the state bar exam. Research suggests more firms are relying on document review attorneys, especially those with a high number of cases.
The opportunity to earn overtime is high in this position. Looking to write a job description or learn more about the Personal Injury Paralegal role? Looking to write a job description or learn more about the Document Review Attorney role?
0コメント